There are a lot of little clues I look for in determining whether somone is worth my time. Here are the top three:
- They bitch moan and whine about how people who voted for Clinton (or one of the third party candidate) did not immediately pledge immediate support for Trump and began working to make his presidency successful. This person, if you search their Facebook feeds, spent eight years preying for Obama to die in a fire, belittled him, his ancestry, his religion, etc.
- ALL news stories that are critical of Trump are the result of a biased press. Why? Because the American press never mentioned Benghazi, Clinton’s email servers or Bill Clinton’s Oval Office blow jobs. Fact-checking sites like Snopes are not to be believed because it’s owner was busted for dog fighting (not true) and it’s funded by George Soros (also not true).
- They invoke Godwin’s Law in an attempt to shut down any thread or post that tries to discuss the Nazi, Alt-right, or White Supremacist tendencies of Trump and the people around him. It is complete bullshit.
From Wikipedia: “Godwin’s law (or Godwin’s rule of Hitler analogies) is an Internet adage which asserts that that “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1“—
that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler.”
It was meant to refer to posts about, for example vegetarianism, and someone comments “You know HITLER was a vegetarian.” Godwin’s Law has no place being evoked in a post of threat that as its premise is a comparison of a person to Hitler.
By the way, Wikipedia is also biased because blar blar Soros blar blar liberal.