Really? He promised to end ISIS once and for all at his Inauguration.
How will he do that? I suppose by bombing any gathering of more than three Islamic families in Afghanistan, Iran and/or Iran. And when the press mention those pesky photos of dead children, he yell at them about being “fake news” and the supporters he’s planted in the press conference will cheer him on.
All the while, he’s up at the lectern, gesticulating wildly with those tiny hands of his, trying desperately to mask the size of his small penis.
Our Fearless Leader.
Midterms just two years away. New elections for president in four. If he hasn’t declared himself Fuhrer for life by then.
Emotionally, i have a hard time accepting that this blog or my writings therein are dangerous. But then, i have never blogged during repressive regime headed by a petulant man-child before. We’ll find out on Jan 20.
I dunno. Perhaps The Donald will continue to allow me and people like me to keep calling him a small-handed, orange-haired douche-nozzle and will never retaliate. Or, if you notice I’m not blogging anymore, and I stop answering me phone and showing up at Starbucks, I’m either dead in a ditch or I’ve been send to a camp.
There are a lot of little clues I look for in determining whether somone is worth my time. Here are the top three:
- They bitch moan and whine about how people who voted for Clinton (or one of the third party candidate) did not immediately pledge immediate support for Trump and began working to make his presidency successful. This person, if you search their Facebook feeds, spent eight years preying for Obama to die in a fire, belittled him, his ancestry, his religion, etc.
- ALL news stories that are critical of Trump are the result of a biased press. Why? Because the American press never mentioned Benghazi, Clinton’s email servers or Bill Clinton’s Oval Office blow jobs. Fact-checking sites like Snopes are not to be believed because it’s owner was busted for dog fighting (not true) and it’s funded by George Soros (also not true).
- They invoke Godwin’s Law in an attempt to shut down any thread or post that tries to discuss the Nazi, Alt-right, or White Supremacist tendencies of Trump and the people around him. It is complete bullshit.
From Wikipedia: “Godwin’s law (or Godwin’s rule of Hitler analogies) is an Internet adage which asserts that that “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1“—that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler.”
It was meant to refer to posts about, for example vegetarianism, and someone comments “You know HITLER was a vegetarian.” Godwin’s Law has no place being evoked in a post of threat that as its premise is a comparison of a person to Hitler.
By the way, Wikipedia is also biased because blar blar Soros blar blar liberal.
Hitler’s rise to power was essentially complete in March 1933. There were, no doubt, people who still maintained some small grasp of political power, some small position of responsibility of wealth, and they wished to maintain these things. ‘Give Hitler a chance,’ they said, because they wanted to keep their own grasp on power and money. They thought they could ride out the storm
These are the people who we need to get rid of FIRST. Because they will be among the first to suffer after inauguration day. The new regime will not tolerate anyone holding any power who does not agree with them 100 percent.
Myself, I am making a list. Just as Trump’s supporters are no doubt doing.