I am one dangerous dude (apparently)

Emotionally, i have a hard time accepting that this blog or my writings therein are dangerous. But then, i have never blogged during repressive regime headed by a petulant man-child before. We’ll find out on Jan 20.

I dunno. Perhaps The Donald will continue to allow me and people like me to keep calling him a small-handed, orange-haired douche-nozzle and will never retaliate. Or, if you notice I’m not blogging anymore, and I stop answering me phone and showing up at Starbucks, I’m either dead in a ditch or I’ve been send to a camp.

Sorry Trumpsters … Snopes is to be believed

From The New York Times:

“Rationality seems to have fallen out of vogue,” said Brooke Binkowski, Snopes’s managing editor. “People don’t know what to believe anymore. Everything is really strange right now.”

That is certainly true at Snopes itself. For 20 years, the site was dedicated to urban legends, like the purported existence of alligators in New York City sewers, and other benign misinformation. But its range and readership increased significantly during a prolonged presidential election campaign in which the facts became a partisan issue and reality itself seemed up for grabs.

One way to chart Snopes’s increasing prominence is by measuring the rise in fake news about the site itself. If you believe the internet, the founder of Snopes, David Mikkelson, has a longer rap sheet than Al Capone. He was supposedly arrested for committing fraud and corruption and running a pit bull ring. In the wake of a deal that Snopes and others made this month to start fact-checking for Facebook, new slurs and allegations poured forth.

The underlying message of these spurious attacks is that the movement to fact-check the internet is a left-wing conspiracy whose real goal is to censor the right, and therefore must be resisted at all costs.

[snip]

All of Snopes’s revenue — Mr. Mikkelson says he doesn’t know what it is — come from ads. Facebook is not paying for its services. Nor is the billionaire George Soros funding the site, although that is sometimes asserted in anti-Snopes stories.

Donations are up post-Trump at nonprofit public news sites like Peoria Pundit

From The New York Times:

Almost a month later, the money keeps coming, $10 and $20 and sometimes hundreds of dollars or more from small donors all over the country.

At the Center for Public Integrity in Washington and its international investigative arm, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, individual donations are up about 70 percent compared to the same period last year.

The donor pool for the Marshall Project, a two-year-old outfit that examines the American criminal justice system, is up 20 percent since the election.

And at ProPublica, the investigative news organization that pledges to hold the powerful accountable, the postelection haul, $750,000, has easily eclipsed the total raised from small-dollar donors in all of 2015, about $500,000.

The list goes on. From local public radio affiliates to established watchdog groups to start-ups that focus on a single issue, nonprofit, nonpartisan media is having a moment.

Use the PayPal button in my sidebar to donate to The Peoria Pundit.

It’s pledge day here at The Peoria Pundit

eye_on_blogsDo you like what you see here? Want to see it continue? Then consider making a donation. National Public Radio does it, why not a blog? And like NPR, this blog exists without advertising. Use the PayPal button below, or use the donation button page HERE.

Daddy needs a new pair of shows. And to pay off some traffic tickets. And to buy a new laptop battery. And a new digital camera.